?

Log in

espejoses
24 June 2011 @ 01:07 pm
Do not know if any one has seen this article http://housedailydose.squarespace.com/house-daily-dose/2011/6/23/on-tv-a-refuge-for-stage-actors-the-good-wife.html
, which should be noted this paragraph:

" What has been interesting about “The Good Wife,” is that the narrative does not depend on a must-see relationship in the manner of “House,” where House (Hugh Laurie) and Cuddy (Lisa Edelstein), despite their problems, seem destined for each other and you want neither to be with anyone else. Alicia might be happy with Will, or a fully reformed version of her husband, Peter Florrick (Chris Noth) or someone else entirely. And in a sense, the real victory would be neither man but instead some happy solitude and a world of options."

In it, quite rightly, is nswer a clear view of that the writers missed in the series, losing the true reality of the characters and the relationship of central characters in the House was based.
So they've finished destroying not only the relationship but the essence of the article serie.ya indicates that as the relationship between House and Cuddy has been constructed so that despite their problems they are intended to end together and neither can nor want to be seen with someone else.
And that despite the series focuses on the character of House, Cuddy's character like Wilson is invisibly linked this with what has been an unbridgeable chasm after the end of Season 7, a vacuum impossible fill with the loud march LE Series,last error that can only be attributed to the above, by not assessing not only the character but the actress who has performed so brilliantly over the years as it deserves.
Since as in the above paragraph is well explained by comparing the narrative of the series House with the narrative of The Good Wife, while Alicia's character can be attached either to Peter, Will, or otherwise, there is also room for her as a person that has passed under the husband of a woman to be emotionally independent character when you finish this series, which in regard to Cuddy, can not happen and is not credible since it partly as an independent woman and successful but unable have a good relationship, largely because his heart is anchored, linked irrevocably with that of House.
 
 
espejoses
24 June 2011 @ 12:47 pm
No se si alguna más ha visto este artículo http://housedailydose.squarespace.com/house-daily-dose/2011/6/23/on-tv-a-refuge-for-stage-actors-the-good-wife.html
del cual hay que destacer este párrafo
What has been interesting about “The Good Wife,” is that the narrative does not depend on a must-see relationship in the manner of “House,” where House (Hugh Laurie) and Cuddy (Lisa Edelstein), despite their problems, seem destined for each other and you want neither to be with anyone else. Alicia might be happy with Will, or a fully reformed version of her husband, Peter Florrick (Chris Noth) or someone else entirely. And in a sense, the real victory would be neither man but instead some happy solitude and a world of options.

En el cual muy acertadamente nos expone una visión clara del porque los escritores erraron en la serie,al perder verdadera realidad de la que los caracteres y la relación de los personajes centrales en House se fundamentaba,y han terminado destrozando no sólo la relacion sino la esencia de la serie.ya que como el articulo indica la relacion entre House y Cuddy ha sido construida para que a pesar de sus problemas ellos esten destinados para finalizar juntos y que ninguno de ellos puedan ni quieran ser vistos con alguien más. Y es que a pesar de que la serie se centra en el personaje de House, el personaje de Cuddy como el de Wilson esta invisiblemente unido este, con lo que se ha producido un abismo insalvable tras el final de la temporada 7,un vacio imposible de llenar, con la estrepitosa marcha de LE de la serie, último error que sólo se puede achacar a los de arriba, por no valorar ya no sólo al personaje sino a la actriz que lo ha realizado tan magistralmente durante todos estos años como se merece. Ya que como en el párrafo de arriba viene perfectamente explicado al comparar la narrativa de la serie en House con la narrativa de The good Wife, mientras que el personaje de Alicia puede acoplarse indistintamente al de Peter, Will o cualquier otro, tambien hay espacio para que ella como persona haya pasado de mujer dependiente del marido ,para ser un personaje independiente sentimentalmente, algo que en lo que respecta a Cuddy, ella parte como una mujer independiente y exitosa pero incapaz de tener una buena relacion sentimental, en gran parte porque su corazon está anclado,enlazado irremediablemente con el de House.
 
 
espejoses
24 May 2011 @ 04:30 pm
Os dejos una gran revisión que espero que Shore y escritores y por supuesto Gregory Yates lean,y se den cuenta de que las fans, si saben y no son un puñado de histéricas.

http://thevoiceoftv.com/tv/2011-05-24/house-review-7x23-finally-%E2%80%9Cmoving-on%E2%80%9D-from-house/?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed
 
 
espejoses
24 May 2011 @ 04:44 am
As I do not think my comment responding to the article by Michael Ausiello tvline sieve pass, I will leave you here my first impressions, to whet your appetite.

First of all tell you that almost killed Cuddy Huddy is a great understatement to say that the writers completely fucked. They had gold in their hands and transformed it into shit, and put the icing on the cake will have left to go to the diamond. It's a joke what they have done with two great characters, if DS and other writers are santisfechos with what they have done, is that they are more old-vicodin that its star character. The end instead of strong in character, in which the characters do a cathartic exercise to understand what each felt for and with the break as they have always known how to make, have become a soap opera scene, in which the protagonist faces in the house of his ex, in a fit of jealousy at the sight of a misleading picture.
How it has become a sister with whom he was understood to become the advisor for the common person is boring?. How can a woman as independent Cuddy has grown into a woman pusillanimous?. The common no fun, exciting, sweeping has become a experpento by works of writers who have sacrificed the dignity of the characters, an idea that only DS has in mind and only he understands.
 
 
espejoses
24 May 2011 @ 04:43 am
Como no creo que mi comentario respondiendo al artículo de Michael Ausiello pase la criba de tvline ,yo os le dejo aquí, es mi primeras impresiones, para abrir boca.
Ante todo decirte que el Huddy casi mato a Cuddy es un gran eufemismo para decir que los escritores la cagaron del todo. Ellos tenian oro en sus manos y lo han transformado en mierda, y para poner la guinda al pastel se han dejado ir al diamante. Es una broma lo que han hecho con dos grandes personajes, si DS y demás escritores estan santisfechos con lo que han hecho, es que estan más pasados de vicodin que su personaje estrella. El final en vez de fuerte y en caracter ,en la que los personajes hacen un ejercicio catarquico para comprender lo que cada uno sentia por y con la ruptura como ellos siempre han sabido hacer, lo han convertido en una escena de culebron, en la que el protagonista se encara en la casa de su ex , en un ataque de celos a la visión de una equívoca escena.
Cómo se ha convertido una hermana con quien no se entendia llegar a ser el consejero de alguien para lo comun es aburrido?. ¿Cómo una mujer como Cuddy independiente se ha llegado a convertir en una mujer pusílanime?. El no comun divertido, excitante ,arrebatador se ha convertido en un experpento por obra de los escritores quien han sacrificado la dignidad de los personajes, por una idea que sólo DS tiene en la cabeza y sólo el comprende.
 
 
 
espejoses
21 May 2011 @ 06:58 pm
I have some videos posted on twitter, not mine of course, and give my appreciation to the editors. I bring it to me because they tell us Edelstein Lisa deserves to be on the 8T, because it makes a difference. There will be a before and after in House but returns.

Os dejo unos videos que han colgado en twitter, no son mios por supuesto, y doy mi admiración a las editoras. Los traigo porque para mí ellos nos dicen porque Lisa Eldestein se merece estar en la 8T, porque ella hace la diferencia. Habra un antes y un despues en House sino vuelve.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgbyDOUdBD4&feature=share

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikRgupBIzQU&feature=youtu.be&a
 
 
espejoses
18 May 2011 @ 05:52 pm
Os dejo una link en favor de Lisa Eldestein
http://networkedblogs.com/hZwbZ
Lanza as critical for Lisa Edelstein
http://networkedblogs.com/hZwbZ
 
 
espejoses
18 May 2011 @ 11:59 am
I write from Spain and unconditionally loving the series since day one, and me there are many around the world who deny what happened with Lisa Eldestein.
Probably our voices fall on deaf ears, and not even be read, is more, they think they are ridiculous as the things that happen in the world, we bother to complain, but not I'm going to stop expressing them.
Television how cinema is an art and entertainment, and for this reason we have it, but for us consumers, it is also an outlet for shit like in the world.
I always thought that this series deserved to have a final agreement to its quality, as we say in slang bullfighting through the front door, but I do not think that this happens with the departure of Lisa Edelstein. Terrible mistake to let her go and all put in the position to do so. You have done the economic calculations are not artistically. May reduce costs but will reduce a lot of profit. For my have miscalculated, the series is the top seller in the world. Lovers of the series, are also independent amamtes Cuddy shipper. His character is transcendental and a pillar in the House that was said by by Katie Jacobs, producer of the series. He is the heart of the House but Lisa Cuddy is the spine.
 
 
espejoses
16 May 2011 @ 11:10 pm
Thanks Barbara Barnett for bringing this interview, which for me brings a different reading of that "in general people do not change." There is also a qualification to this people do not change, which comes to us as she puts it.
She says the question of whether House has undergone a change after all her experiences, and I quote "He has gone through a lot, but I'm not sure that people change" From what I read, she's doing personal consideration, not a categorical statement, which comes to us that each person can have a reading or viewing of this issue. But his estate does not end there, she then explained her point of view with the following words "But I think they can, through experience, to recognize your fears or your Achilles heel and overcome or achieve something more than they initially envisioned for them. This establishment does not give it a pessimistic view and model of the myth of Sisyphus,which despite its attempts, always turns to failure and starting point.
Translating this view the character of House, she then says, he does not think House itself will change, but if you can get a better understanding of himself, and that same understanding will lead to perhaps make some choices that will serve to achieve what he wants in life. And now is the one who makes it.
In this aspect that I read, is that at this point, he can not remain a passive subject, he can not keep thinking that the status of your best, your happiness will come from the actions of others but of himself. From what I've seen over the years on this journey with House, he has allowed the circumstances, that the actions of others (either her father, Stacy, Wilson and Cuddy all) conditioned their lives, as well as stroke, and especially the painful condition his live.
Many of you have seen in Cuddy's decision to break as a fact selfish, something I've seen yet painfully selfless, even at the risk of appearing in the vision of not only House but fans of the series (not just the shippers) and the bad of the story, the character House traitor leaving in the lurch. Character which for many has been stripped of the power he possessed, making it seem almost a caricature of itself.
In this regard there are parallels between House / stroke / Stacy and House / breaks / Cuddy brings us full circle and full circle and end point of the story that began with Stacy's decision to betray their trust and steal him the final decision on tratamineto and thus condemning him to live a life of pain and thus conditioning his life addiction. Something that will come back later.
In this regard there are parallels between the role given to Cuddy and David Shore is final and needed to break the chain and the vicious circle in which House is undies after infarction, the same has been given during these seven years, which is none other than his constant saving.
She saved him to mediate between his desire not to be amputated his leg and Stacy ultimate decision as to save the next life. (House knew that if he chose the procedure did not work or you killed, or left him with chronic pain, so this was not caused entirely by the Cuddy procedure itself, although the sense of guilt for this, and House manipulation that made this fact, did believe in the one guilty of it). She also saved him by giving him a job, creating an apartment for him and of course working to save year after year, not only with the board, but Tritter fiasco and swore in the trinbunal. Unless you care to be his conscience and place limits on the procedure. We except to bring to life several times physically, and to make House in his sick mind at their rescuer as love object and the cause to overcome his addiction.
From my point of view Cuddy remains strong all the time she was in relationship with House, kept fighting with him and helping to overcome the obstacles that might be trying that he could get to see their points of view and still operating when she was also his boss and all that this may cause.
She had never had trouble accepting the existence of pills in his life and his addiction before, why after premonitory dreams in Bombshells, the consumption of a single pill, made the decision to break. But what event or events occurred to her to be this way with him as intransigent.
This was not his medical actions were not the physical risks assumed with impulsive behavior, nor were their metiras and childish games, nor the events that occurred in two stories, or even that he did not attend the party on their behalf or simple recognition by the House of his deep love for her, or not being at his side in his medical crisis at the end.
It was only the knowledge of the profound role that he had assigned, as in life, which did not exist in some way, would the disintegration of its stability, derrumbamineto and possibly self-destruction.
She realized the true extent of being a savior, which stripped of all romantic charge that this could lead, was a place too risky to take on everything, because if you voluntarily want to host, life, on the other hand, sometimes capriciously puts us on our way, a curve ball that is difficult even if we want to successfully overcome. Cuddy could have forgiven him this time and helped to overcome this little bump, which provably past the danger, had continued as before before it happened, he avoids drugs and she helped out of their mistakes.
But what happens next time, and had it not been so lucky, if that was before a shock would have been an accidental death. Where would he at that time brutal and haphazard total annihilation of the person that you lean.
House has placed her on a pedestal too high a place for a mortal. Cuddy does not want to be your love, at least not that way, she wants to be his equal, his partner, someone with whom to share, support, help and support what life will bring even this too is in pain.
At the end of Bombshells, House is in the same place that was the end of Help me, or apparently is in the same place which is none other than the cliff to choose the easy way out and relapse.
More as we see in his dizzying relapse also see that satisfaction in their ways to cooperate not only not help but find them more empty and also repulsive. There is comfort, or bring you back to heal the wounds media.
In this regard the relationship as Huddy says the DS is finite, there is no turning back.
But, perhaps as Katie Jacobs says, if House will learn from what has been lost, of what he wants and how to cooperate with their Achilles’ heals , there is another possibility for House and Cuddy, which will be over and they had not .
On the other hand that "people do not change" need not be so unreasonable and it seems to us only because we started from a premise that may be a lie. What is the true nature of the House, is the image that we were in the pilot episode back in the first session, or is this a mask, the shield with which hides the real House and built after the infarction and betrayal Stacy.
That if the stealing is their own decision, steals, mutilates his ability to act on what he wants, just as it allows Vicodin governs their life, let others, but most especially Wilson and Cuddy are who dictate their decisions and especially the same mistakes.
Throughout the whole series through performance Tantoo of patients and physicians who treat them tell us that actions have consequences and they end up biting the ass. What we do with the consequences is what will dictate the future.
The result of House to give Stacy the total power as the person who could decide on their medical crisis, and the acts of this, is not to assume that he would have to live with the consequences it poses, preferring to blame Stacy and Cuddy by extension, its share of blame.
Assume that guilt is to face their problems and their pain as part of who he is now, and what you can do with the part that I do not like and being that it has become.
We know that all the features of House atren we like and are intrinsic in him and Stacy were already before, but as he said Hanna House to Help me, being bitter, lonely and dependent has become part of it was not .
We also became clear that all the abuses and mistakes by the father of House, there was a time in the House that their behavior was not all bad. And as the patient could only recall the negative moments, his mistake was in waiting to feed on these and only these. House may not be much change, but change those whores of behavior led to his being he became.
Assume that guilt is to face their problems and their pain as part of who he is now, and what you can do with the part that I do not like and being that it has become.
We know that all the features of House that we like and we attract are intrinsic in him before the Stacy had come into his life and later in life with her, but as he said Hanna House to Help me, being bitter , alone and dependent has become not a part of it.
We also became clear that despite all the abuses and mistakes and the father of House, there was a time in the House that their behavior was not all bad. But as the patient who only remember the negative moments, his mistake was in eating these with what ended up waiting only these. House may not be much change, but change those whores of behavior led to his being he became.
As for the parallel House / stroke / Stacy and House / Cuddy break may seem that both Stacy and Cuddy House betrayed in the same manner and on behalf of those he professed love for me is a substantial difference.
While House was given confidence by naming your proxy, even knowing that she desires, she deliberately did not bring the intermediate option to contention and argument, acting on his back and abuse the power that had given freely. Stacy is an attorney and knows only handle but to convince the best possible deal to their arguments, to make a consent state.

For Cuddy, even if they decide to try working relationship and discuss its possibilities to operate its history Cuddy not deliberately lied in their arguments, she wants to change, and certainly it is true, but does not measure their strength and especially it acts without the full knowledge that gives power to make their rescuer and solely responsible for his downfall. But even she does not want to destroy you, just do not want to be like her said her addiction, feed it to avoid confronting the true issue, which is none other than knowing not say no.
From my point of view on the relationship unconsciously used to Cuddy for her as well as to at work, save him from its limitations and its own disaster, so if this fails, it was easier to put the blame on her, not deliberately, but unconsciously.
 
 
espejoses
16 May 2011 @ 08:49 pm
Gracias Barbara Barnett por traernos esta entrevista, la cual para mi me trae una distinta lectura de ese " en general las personas no cambian". Hay además una matización a este las personas no cambian, la cual nos llega de como ella dice ello.
Ella dice a la pregunta de sí House ha sufrido un cambio despúes de todas sus experiencias, y cito " él ha ido a través de un monton,pero yo no estoy seguro de que las personas cambien " De lo que Yo leo , ella esta haciendo una consideración personal, no una afirmación categórica, lo que nos viene a decirnos que cada persona puede tener una lectura o visión de esa cuestión. Pero su estamento no termina allí, ella seguidamente explica su punto de vista con estas otras palabras " Sin embargo, yo pienso que ellos pueden , a través de la experiencia, reconocer sus temores ó su talon de Aquiles y superarlos ó alcanzar algo más de lo que ellós en principio visionaron para ellos. De esté estamento ella no dá una visión pesimista y del míto de Sisifó mismo, en el cual pese a sus intentos, siempre se vuelve al fracaso y al punto de partida. Trasladando esta opinión al personaje de House, ella seguidamente dice, que no piensa que House en si mismo cambie, pero si puede llegar a una mejor comprensión de sí mismo, y que esa misma comprensión quiza le lleve a hacer unas elecciones que le sirvan para alcanzar lo que el quiere de la vida. Y ahora es el quien lo hace. En esto último lo que yo leo , es que a este punto , el no puede seguir siendo un sujeto pasivo, el no puede seguir pensando que su mejor estatus, su felicidad le venga de los actos de los demás, sino de él mismo. De lo que yo he visto durante todos estos años de viaje House a permitido que las circustancias, que las acciones de los demas ( ya sea su padre, Stacy ,Wilson y sobre todo Cuddy) condicionaran su vida, lo mismo que el infarto, y sobre todo el dolor condicionaran su vida.
Muchas de vosotras habeis visto en la decisión de Cuddy de romper como un hecho egoista, algo que yo he visto sin embargo dolorosamente altruista, aun a riesgo de parecer en la visión de no sólo de House sino de los fans de la serie ( no sólo los shippers ) como la mala de la historia, el personaje traidor que deja a House en la estacada. Personaje el cual para muchas ha sido despojada de la fuerza que poseia, casí haciendola parecer una caricatura de la misma.
En este sentido hay un paralelismo entre House/ infarto / Stacy y House / ruptura / Cuddy que nos lleva al punto de partida y al círculo lleno y punto final de la historia que empezó con la decisión de Stacy de traicionar su cónfianza y arrevatarle la final decisión sobre su tratamineto y por lo tanto su persona condenandolé a vivir una vida de dolor y consiguientemente una adicción condicionando su vida. Algo sobre lo que volvere más tarde.
El papel dado a Cuddy por David Shore es definitivo y necesario para romper la cadena y el circulo viciado en el que House se undió tras el infarto,es el mismo que le ha sido dado durante todos estos siete años, que no es otro que el de su constante salvadora. Ella le salvo al mediar entre su deseo de no amputarsele la pierna y la decisión última de Stacy como su próxima de salvarle la vida. ( House sabia que si el procedimiento que el eligió no funcionaba ó le mataba ,ó le dejaba con dolor crónico, por lo que este no fué causado totalmente por el procedimiento de Cuddy en si mismo, aunque el sentido de culpabilidad de esta, y la manipulación que House hizo de este hecho, la hizo creerse en la única culpable del mismo ). Ella tambien le salvo por darle un trabajo, crear un departamento para él y por salvar supuesto de trabajo año tras año, no sólo con la junta directiva, sino con el fiasco de Tritter y su perjuró en el trinbunal. Le salvo al ser su conciencia médica y ponerle límites en su procedimiento. Le salvo al traerle a la vida varias veces físicamente, y al convertirla House en su mente enferma en su salvadora como objeto de su amor y la causa para superar su adicción.
Desde mi punto de vista Cuddy sigue siendo fuerte durante todo el tiempo que ella estuvo en relación con House, siguío peleando con él y ayudando a solventar los escollos que esta pudiera tener intentando que el pudiera llegar a ver sus puntos de vista y que funcionara aún siendo ella tambien su jefa y todo lo que esto pudiera acarrear. Ella nunca habia tenido problemas para aceptar la existencia de las pildoras en su vida como su adicción antes, por qué tras los sueños premonitorios en Bombshells , el consumo de una única pildora , la hizo tomar la decisión de romper. Pero qué suceso ó sucesos ocurrierón para que ella fuera de esta forma tan intransigente con él. No fueron sus actuaciones médicas, no fueron los riesgos físicos que asumío con su comportamiento impulsivo, ni sus pueriles metiras y juegos, ni los hechos que ocurrieron en dos historias, ni siquiera que no aistiera a la fiesta en su nombre ó el reconocimiento por parte de House simplemente su amor por ella, ni el no estar a su lado en su crisis médica. Fué únicamente el conocimiento del profundo papél que el la habia atribuido,dado en su vida, en el cual su no existencia en alguna manera, supondria la desintegración de su estabilidad, derrumbamineto y posiblemente su autodestrucción. Ella se dió cuenta de la verdadera dimensión de ser su salvadora, el cual despojado de toda la carga romántica que este llevaba, era un lugar demasiado arriesgado de tomar sobre todo ,porque aunque ella voluntariamente desease acoger , la vida, caprichosamente a veces nos pone en nuestro camino , una bola curva, que aunque queramos es dificil de sortear con éxito. Cuddy podia haberle perdonado esta vez y ayudado a superar este pequeño bache. Provablemente pasado el riesgo inminente, hubiera seguido como hasta antes de que ocurriera, el evitando consumir drogas y ella ayudandole a salir de sus errores. Pero qué ocurriera la próxima vez , y si no hubiera tanta suerte , el susto de ahora hubiera sido una muerte accidental y fortuita . Donde quedaria House en ese momento brutal de aniquilación total de la persona en la que uno se apoya. Como tan asombrosamente interpretado en la escena de la ruptura Cuddy le dijo a House y luego más tarde a Wilson, puede que verdaderamente me ames , pero sobre todo soy tu salvadora, y el amor que el la profesa sin dejar de ser real, es su vicodin , su adicción, su deflación del verdadero problena, que no es sino enfrentarse a sus temores,su capacidad para aceptar el dolor. House ha puesto a Cuddy en un pedestal un lugar demasiado alto para un mortal. Cuddy no quiere ser su amor ,al menos no así , ella quiere ser su igual , su pareja, alguien con el que compartir , apoyarse , ayudarse y soportar lo que la vida les traiga aunque sea tambien en dolor.
Al final de Bombshells, House esta en el mismo lugar que él estaba al final de Help me, o en apariencia está en el mismo lugar el cual no es otro que el precipició para elegir por el camino facil y la recaida.
Más a medida que le vemos en su vertiginosa recaida tambien vemos que la satisfacción en sus modos de cooperar no soló no le ayudan sino que los encuentra más vacios y tambien repulsivos. No encuentra el consuelo, ni le traen de vuelta los soportes para curarse las heridas.
En este sentido la relación Huddy como dice DS esta finita, no hay vuelta atras.
Pero sí , tal vez como dice Katie Jacobs, House aprende de lo que ha perdido, de lo que quiere y como cooperar con su talon de Aquieles, haya otra posibilidad para House y para Cuddy, la cual sera otra y no la que tenian.

Por otro lado que " las personas no cambian" no tiene por que ser tan irrazonable y ello sólo nos parezca porque hemos partido de una premisa que tal vez sea una mentira. Cual es la verdadera naturaleza de House, es la imagen que nos dieron en el episodio piloto de vuelta en la primera sesión, ó es ésta una careta, la coraza con la cual el verdadero House se esconde y que construyo tras el infarto y la traición de Stacy .Que si al robar ésta su propia decisión, le roba , le mutila su capacidad para actuar sobre lo que él quiere, y del mismo modo él permite que la vicodina rija su vida,deja que los demás , pero principalmente Wilson y sobre todo Cuddy sean quienes dictaminen sus decisiones y sobre todo sus errores de las mismas.
A lo largo de toda la serie tanto los pacientes como los médicos nos dicen que las acciones tienen sus consecuencias y estas terminan mordiendolos el culo. Lo que hacemos con las consecuencias es lo que dictaminará el futuro.
La consecuencia de House al darle el total poder a Stacy como la persona que podia decidir sobre su crisis médica , y los actos de esta, es no asumir que él tendria que vivir con las consecuencias que esto podria acarrearle, prefiriendo culpar a Stacy y a Cuddy por extensión de su parte de culpa.
Asumir esa culpa es enfrentarse a sus problemas y a su dolor como parte de quién él es ahora, y su participación aunque pequeña en las consecuencias, de lo que puede hacer con la parte de ese Yo que no le gusta y en el ser que se ha convertido.
Sabemos que todas las caracteristicas de House que a nosotros nos gustan y nos atraen son intrínsicas en él, las tenia antes de que Stacy entrará en su vida y despúes en su vida con ella, pero como dijo House a Hanna en Help me , el ser amargado ,solitario y dependiente que ha llegado a ser no formaba parte de él, pero si contribuyo a su aparición.
Tambien nos quedo claro que a pesar y con todos los abusos y errores cometidos por parte del padre de House, hubo un tiempo en el que su comportamiento con House no fue todo malo. Pero como la paciente que sólo recordaba los momentos negativos, su error fue en alimentarse de estos con lo que terminó por esperar unicamente estos. Tal vez House no deba tanto cambiar , sino modificar esas putas de comportamiento que le llevaron a ser el ser en que se convirtió.
En cuanto al paralelismo de House/ infarto / Stacy y House / ruptura Cuddy pueda parecer que tanto Stacy y Cuddy traicionaron a House en la misma manera y en nombre del amor que estas le profesaban, para mi hay una diferencia sustancial.
Mientras que House la dio total confianza al nombrarla su proxi, es que ella aún sabiendo sus deseos, ella deliberadamente no trajo la opción intermedia a discursión, actuando sobre su espalda y abusar de el poder que este libremente la habia dado. Stacy es abogado y sabe solo manipular sino convencer del mejor posible negociación a sus argumentos, hasta hacerle afirmar un consentimiento.
En el caso de Cuddy, aunque ellos deciden intentar trabajar la relación y discuten sus posibilidades de hacer funcionar su historia Cuddy no deliveradamente le miente en sus argumentos, ella con quiere que cambie, y seguramente es verdad, pero no mide sus fuerzas y sobre todo ella actua sin el pleno conocimiento del poder que el la da al hacerla su salvadora y única responsable de su caida. Pero más aún ella no quiere destruirle, simplemente no quiere ser como ella dijo su adicción, alimentarse de ella para no enfrentarse con su verdadero problema, el cual no es otro que saber no saber decir no.
Desde mi punto de vista en la relación incoscientemente útilizaba a Cuddy para que ella lo mismo que hacia en el trabajo, le salvara de sus limitaciones y de su propio desastre, para así si esta fallara, era más facil poner la culpa en ella,no deliberadamente , pero si incoscientemente.